Allowed

Hetram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jan 2020CRLMB/15620/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bails of the petitioner, Hetram, arrested under Section 392 IPC, upon the submission that trial would take long. The petitioner was ordered to surrender and furnish a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court on appeal dates and summons.

Hetram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15620/2019

¶3

Hetram S/o Ganga Ram, Aged About 22 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Siniyala, Police Station Jasarasar, District Bikaner (Raj.). (Now in judicial custody at District Jail, Nagaur).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. A.R. Godara
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi,P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶10

Order

¶11

03/01/2020

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 71/2019, Police Station Surpaliya, District Nagaur for the offence under Section 392 of I.P.C.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. The charge-sheet has already been filed. The petitioner is behind the Bars since more than three months. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶15

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-15620/2019]

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

¶19

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Hetram S/o Ganga Ram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 71/2019, Police Station Surpaliya, District Nagaur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees : Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶21

53-Inder/-

Hetram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hetram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jethmal Singh Vs State

Om Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Tulcha Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Arjun Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sarjeet Vs State

Suresh Kumar Vs State