Pushkar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This Court granted bail to the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with an FIR for offences under the NDPS Act, noting that the prosecution evidence consisted only of the main accused's statement and tower location data without corroboration.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail via personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12018/2020
Pushkar S/o Har Lal Jat, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Nikumbh, Police Station Nikumbh, District Chittorgarh. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Ramdeen Choudharyon VC |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gaurav Singh PP for the State. |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
10/12/2020
In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in an NDPS case where the only evidence is the statement of the main accused corroborated solely by tower location.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pushkar S/o Har Lal Jat
- respondent
State
Coram
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/12018/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court