Allowed

Budhram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Dec 2020CRLMB/14248/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a bail application filed for offences under Section 67 IT Act and Indecent Representation of Women Act, 1986, citing lack of prior record and pending trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to appear before the trial court.

Budhram Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14248/2020

¶3

Budhram S/o Shri Channaram, Aged About 22 Years, By Caste Vishnoi, R/o Raneri, Police Thana Baap, District Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Phalodi).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Kailash Khileryon VC
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mahipal Vishnoi PP

¶9

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶10

Order

¶11

09/12/2020

¶12

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶13

This Court perused the material available on record.

¶14

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 470/2019 of Police Station Phalodi District JOdhpur for the offences punishable under Section 67 IT Act and 4/6 Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that there are no previous criminal antecedents against the petitioner.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of the proceedings is

¶18

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-14248/2020]

¶19

likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Budhram S/o Shri Channaram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 470/2019 Police Station Phalodi District JOdhpur provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶22

ns. 44-1/-

Budhram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Budhram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Prakash @ Jaina Vs State

Vijay Kumar Vs State

Ranjeet Kumar Vs State

Gopal Vs State

Dana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Shanker Lal Jyani Vs State