Allowed

Kala Son of Shri Kamar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Nov 2020CRLMB/11132/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed anticipatory bail to two petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a bail application regarding FIR No.108/2019. The court acknowledged a compromise between parties and directed release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each; conditions imposed on availability for interrogation, no inducement, and no leaving India.

Kala Son of Shri Kamar Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11132/2020

¶3

Kala Son Of Shri Kamar, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Rasulpur Police Station Kaithwara District Bharatpur.

¶4

Sahjad Son Of Shri Kamar, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Rasulpur Police Station Kaithwara District Bharatpur.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Adv. (through video conference)
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP
For Complainant(s)	:	Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, Adv. (through video conference)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

10/11/2020

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.108/2019 Registered at Police Station Kaithwara District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 324, 326, 307 and 34 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a compromise has been arrived between the parties which is available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the complainant(through video conference) has also admitted the fact of compromise.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-11132/2020]

¶19

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶20

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kaithwara District Bharatpur in F.I.R. No.108/2019 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners – Kala Son Of Shri Kamar & Sahjad Son Of Shri Kamar they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶21

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶22

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶23

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶24

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶25

Gourav/21

Kala Son of Shri Kamar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kala Son of Shri Kamar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Phool Chand Meena Vs State of Rajastahan

Babulal S/O Fundilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Saubhgya Pujari @ Mansu S/O Sundar Lal @ Lala Pujari B/C Bonka Rajpoot Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Vs Union of India

Ummed @ Samay Singh S/O Bhurya Vs State of Rajasthan

Lakkhi S/O Shri Ramju Vs State of Rajasthan