Allowed

Lakkhi S/O Shri Ramju v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Nov 2020CRLMB/11095/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the anticipatory bail application of two accused persons faced with charges under various sections of the IPC, observing that a compromise was made between the parties and directing their release upon furnishing a bond with sureties under statutory conditions. text

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioners to be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, subject to specific conditions regarding police interrogati

Lakkhi S/O Shri Ramju Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11095/2020

¶3

Lakkhi S/o Shri Ramju, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Rasulpur Police Station Kaithwara District Bharatpur.

¶4

Mev Khan S/o Shri Ramju, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Rasulpur Police Station Kaithwara District Bharatpur.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, Adv. (through video conference)
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP
For Complainant(s)	:	Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Adv.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

10/11/2020

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.107/2019 Registered at Police Station Kaithwara District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 324, 325, 326, 307 and 34 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners(through video conference) submits that a compromise has been arrived between the parties which is available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the complainant has also admitted the fact of compromise.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMB-11095/2020]

¶20

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶21

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kaithwara District Bharatpur in F.I.R. No.107/2019 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners – Lakkhi S/o Shri Ramju & Mev Khan S/o Shri Ramju they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶24

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶26

Gourav/20

Lakkhi S/O Shri Ramju v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakkhi S/O Shri Ramju v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Phool Chand Meena Vs State of Rajastahan

Babulal S/O Fundilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Saubhgya Pujari @ Mansu S/O Sundar Lal @ Lala Pujari B/C Bonka Rajpoot Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Vs Union of India

Ummed @ Samay Singh S/O Bhurya Vs State of Rajasthan

Kala Son of Shri Kamar Vs State of Rajasthan