The petitioner challenged by anticipatory bail application which became infructuous after being already enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court. The application was dismissed as such.
Application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10383/2019
Smt. Nidhi Sharma W/o Rajesh Sharma D/o Ashok Pancholi, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. 1-C-14 Talwadi SFS 1C1 Talwadi Tehsil Laadpura, District Kota.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Digvijay Singh for Dr. RDSS Kharlia |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Farzand Ali, AAG-cum-GA assisted byMr. Mahipal Bishnoi,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
08/01/2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.09.2019 and therefore the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
In view of the submissions, the present anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
154-SunilS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application filed when the petitioner has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Nidhi Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
