Allowed

Mahesh Chand Sain S/O Jagdish Prasad B/C Nai v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Dec 2019SOSA/1871/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge criminal bench allowed a suspension of sentence application. The court directed the release of the applicant on bail during the pendency of the criminal appeal, subject to the furnishing of a personal bond and two sureties. Since no conviction details appear, the specific subject remains general.

What did the court decide?

The execution of the sentence awarded to the applicant is suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal, directing his release on bail on a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/-

Mahesh Chand Sain S/O Jagdish Prasad B/C Nai Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. (Suspension of Sentence) Application No.

¶3

1871/2019

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2643/2019

¶6

Mahesh Chand Sain S/o Jagdish Prasad B/c Nai, R/o Near Reendli Phatak, Nangal Charan Police Station Mandawar, Distt. Dasua (At Present In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶7

----Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Gajanand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

¶13

Order

¶14

17/12/2019

¶15

This criminal misc suspension of sentence application has been filed by the applicant along with the criminal appeal.

¶16

Counsel for the applicant along with appeal has annexed certificate under Rule 311(3) Rajasthan High Court Ordinance wherein it has been mentioned that the applicant was on bail during the course of trial, he never misused the liberty of bail granted to him and at present applicant is confined in judicial custody. Counsel further submits that total sentence awarded for the different offences is of five years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine the accused appellant has been directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one month. Counsel further submits that the

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLAS-2643/2019]

¶19

hearing of the criminal appeal may take long time, hence, the sentence awarded to the applicant may be suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and he be released on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and carefully scanned the entire material available on record, this suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicant Mahesh Chand Sain S/o Jagdish Prasad shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and he be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/together with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 20/01/2020 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J

¶22

Ashu/142

Mahesh Chand Sain S/O Jagdish Prasad B/C Nai v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Chand Sain S/O Jagdish Prasad B/C Nai v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav Vs Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav Vs Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav Vs Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Chetan Kumar S/O Jankilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer Pankaj S/O Latoorlal Dhobi Dhobi B/C Dhobi Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukut Bihari S/O Harichandra Vs State of Rajasthan