Allowed

Chetan Kumar S/O Jankilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Dec 2019CRLMB/17707/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to the accused petitioner Chetan Kumar, directing him to furnish a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Release of the accused petitioner on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Chetan Kumar S/O Jankilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17707/2019

¶3

Chetan Kumar S/o Jankilal, B/c Ahir, R/o Amlawada Kharan P.S. Sarthal, District Baran (Raj.). (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Chhabra)

¶4

----Accused-Applicant

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gorishankar Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

¶9

Order

¶10

17/12/2019

¶11

This bail application has been filed under Section 439

¶12

Cr.P.C.

¶13

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.376/2019 was registered at P.S. Chhipabadod, Distt. Baran for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that no criminal case is made out against the petitioner. It has also been contended that the accused petitioner is in judicial lockup since long, the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate, trial of

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-17707/2019]

¶17

the case is likely to take time, hence the accused petitioner be released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner , note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Chetan Kumar S/o Jankilal shall be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/(Rupees fifty thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J

¶22

Dheeraj /175

Chetan Kumar S/O Jankilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chetan Kumar S/O Jankilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav Vs Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav Vs Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav Vs Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Mahaveer Pankaj S/O Latoorlal Dhobi Dhobi B/C Dhobi Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukut Bihari S/O Harichandra Vs State of Rajasthan

Gabbar S/O Neki Santhiya Vs State of Rajasthan