Dismissed

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav v. Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Rajasthan HC16 Dec 2019CRLTP/64/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of three connected criminal transfer applications filed by the petitioner against the respondent. The court dismissed the applications as devoid of merit, noting the applicant failed to establish sufficient grounds for transfer.

What did the court decide?

The criminal miscellaneous transfer applications were dismissed.

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav Vs Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat — Rajasthan HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Transfer Application No. 63/2019

¶3

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/o Shri Chhoturam B/c Yadav, R/o Kotdi Luharwas, Police Station Khandela Distt. Sikar Raj. At Present R/o Ward No. 3, Neemkathana Tehsil And Police Station Neemkathana Distt. Sikar Raj. At Present Posted Constable Driver, C.o. Office, Rajasthan Police, Reengas Distt. Sikar.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Phoolaram S/o Shri Bhagwanaram B/c Jat, R/o Kotdi Luharwas, Tehsil And Police Station Khandela Distt. Sikar.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Transfer Application No. 64/2019 Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/o Shri Chhoturam B/c Yadav, R/o Kotdi Luharwas, Police Station Khandela Distt. Sikar Raj. At Present R/o Ward No. 3, Neemkathana Tehsil And Police Station Neemkathana Distt. Sikar Raj. At Present Posted Constable Driver, C.o. Office, Rajasthan Police, Reengas Distt. Sikar.

¶10

----Petitioner

¶11

Versus

¶12

Phoolaram S/o Shri Bhagwanaram B/c Jat, R/o Kotdi Luharwas, Tehsil And Police Station Khandela Distt. Sikar.

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Transfer Application No. 65/2019 Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/o Shri Chhoturam B/c Yadav, R/o Kotdi Luharwas, Police Station Khandela Distt. Sikar Raj. At Present R/o Ward No. 3, Neemkathana Tehsil And Police Station Neemkathana Distt. Sikar Raj. At Present Posted Constable Driver, C.o. Office, Rajasthan Police, Reengas Distt. Sikar.

¶15

----Petitioner

¶16

Versus

¶17

Phoolaram S/o Shri Bhagwanaram B/c Jat, R/o Kotdi Luharwas, Tehsil And Police Station Khandela Distt. Sikar.

----Respondent

(2 of 3)

[CRLTP-63/2019]

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arpan Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Kudi

¶22

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

¶23

Order

¶24

16/12/2019

¶25

Since the controversy involved in all the three transfer applications are same, hence same are being decided by the common order.

¶26

By filing present transfer applications, the applicants have interalia prayed that in the interest of justice, these transfer applications may be allowed and cases No. 188/2018, 187/2018 and 189/2018: titled as Phoola Ram Vs. Bhanwar Lal Yadav, be transferred to other competent Court, after taking into consideration the grounds taken in the present applications.

¶27

Counsel for respondent opposed the averments made in the transfer applications and submitted that these transfer applications have been filed on frivolous grounds and learned Sessions Judge, Sikar, has dismissed the transfer applications by passing a reasoned order.

¶28

Perused the material placed before me and impugned order dated 17.09.2019.

¶29

It is pertinent to note that the law with regard to transfer of cases is well settled. Though the convenience of the parties including the witnesses to be produced at the trial is also a relevant consideration for deciding the transfer petition. And the convenience of the parties does not necessarily mean the convenience of the petitioners alone who approached the Court on

¶30

(3 of 3)

¶31

[CRLTP-63/2019]

¶32

misconceived notions of apprehension. Convenience for the purposes of transfer means the convenience of the prosecution, other accused, the witnesses and the larger interest of the society.

¶33

The applicant has failed to establish sufficient grounds for allowing these transfer applications.

¶34

Accordingly, these transfer applications are devoid of merit, hence, deserve to be dismissed and the same are accordingly dismissed.

¶35

A copy of this order be placed in each of the file.

¶36

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J

¶37

Pcg/ 68 to 70

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav v. Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav v. Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radheshyam Meena S/O Shri Kalyan Sahai Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Sagir S/O Unis B/C Mev Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Sharma S/O Suresh Kumar Sharma B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav Vs Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Bhanwar Lal Yadav S/O Shri Chhoturam B/C Yadav Vs Phoolaram S/O Shri Bhagwanaram B/C Jat

Dhanturiya S/O Ramkishan B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan