Dismissed

Dr. Naresh Sanklecha v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Rajasthan HC13 Aug 2019SAW/552/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench upheld the constitutionality of Rule 18A of the Pre Conception and Pre Natal Diagnostic Techniques Rules, 1996. After observing that the Supreme Court upheld Section 23 of the parent Act, the Court relied on prior Division Bench precedents to declare the Rules valid. The writ petitions were dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions and appeals are dismissed subject to the condition that applications by acquitted doctors be considered on merits.

Dr. Naresh Sanklecha Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR

¶2

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13411/2018
Prachi Medical Care
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
Connected With
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 522/2018
Sushil Kumar Aseri
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Anr
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 541/2018
Dr. Praveen Garg
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan And Ors.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 543/2018
Dr. Ajay Singhal
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 547/2018
Dr. Vijay Arora
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 548/2018
Dr. Rajendra Gupta
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent

¶3

[CW-13411/2018]

¶4

(2 of 5)

¶5

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 549/2018

¶6

Dr. Vijay Makkar

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus ----Respondent D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 551/2018 ----Petitioner Versus ----Respondent D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 552/2018 ----Petitioner Versus ----Respondent D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 553/2018 ----Petitioner

¶9

State And Ors

¶10

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 551/2018

¶11

Dr. Sutindra Paul Gupta

¶12

State Of Rajasthan And Ors.

¶13

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 552/2018 Dr. Naresh Sanklecha

¶14

Versus State Of Rajasthan And Ors. D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 553/2018 Dr. Pradeep Kumar Versus State Of Rajasthan And Ors. D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 554/2018 Dr. Vijay Prakash Beniwal And Anr Versus State Of Rajasthan And Ors. D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 558/2018 Dr. Kl Bansal Versus State And Ors D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 559/2018 Dr. K.k. Rastogi

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

----Respondent ----Petitioner ----Respondent

----Petitioner

Versus

[CW-13411/2018]

(3 of 5)

State Of Rajasthan And Ors.

¶23

----Respondent

¶24

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 561/2018

Dr.renu Setia

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan And Ors.

¶29

----Respondent

¶30

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 566/2018

Dr. Shankar Lal

----Petitioner

Versus

State And Ors

----Respondent

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 567/2018

¶37

Dr.satyanarayan Mittal

¶38

----Petitioner

¶39

Versus

¶40

State Of Rajasthan And Ors.

¶41

----Respondent

¶42

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 611/2018

¶43

Dr. Banshi Dhar Gupta

¶44

----Petitioner

¶45

Versus

¶46

State Of Rajasthan And Ors.

¶47

----Respondent

¶48

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 613/2018

¶49

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Sethi

¶50

----Petitioner

¶51

Versus

¶52

State Of Rajasthan And Ors.

¶53

----Respondent

¶54

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 630/2018 Dr. P.c. Jain ----Petitioner Versus

¶55

State Of Rajasthan And Ors.

----Respondent

[CW-13411/2018]

(4 of 5)

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ankur Mathur Mr. Bhavit Sharma Mr. Kshamendra Mathur Mr. Nitin Prakash Trivedi Mr. Yashpal Khileree
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. K.S. Rajpurohit, AAG with Mr. Rajat Arora Mr. Sanjeet Purohit
	Ms. Vandana Bhansali
	Mr. Himanshu Pareek for
	Mr. Vipul Singhvi

¶60

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶61

Order

¶62

13/08/2019

¶63

The questions involved in bunch of these cases is the vires of Rule 18A(4)(ii) and 18(A)(vi) of the Pre Conception and Pre Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules of 1996’). Additionally, Sections 22 and 23 of the Pre Conception and Pre Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1994’) have been challenged.

¶64

At the outset, this Court notices that in the judgment, reported as Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India Vs. Union of India & Ors. (AIR 2019 SC 2214), the validity of Section 23 has been upheld. Therefore, the challenge to the Section fails.

¶65

As far as the challenge to the Rule is concerned, the Division Bench judgment in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6482/2017, Sonological & Imaging Socity Vs. Union of India & Anr. and connected case D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5995/2014, Chandrawal

¶66

[CW-13411/2018]

¶67

(5 of 5)

¶68

Hospital & Research Centre Vs. Union of India & Anr. , decided on 12.07.2019, upheld the validity of the Rule and clarified that if a doctor or a medical practitioner is involved in a criminal case, that per se would not bar a Center (so long as it is not involved in a criminal case) securing registration or renewal.

¶69

In these circumstances, the ratio in the case of Sonogical & Imaging Society (supra) would apply.

¶70

The Rule accordingly is held to be valid.

¶71

In the event of any applicant (including a doctor applicant) having been acquitted during the pendency of these proceedings, the bar under Rule 18A of the Rules of 1996, would obviously not apply. If an application is made, that would be considered on its merits and appropriate orders be made by the State.

¶72

The writ petitions and appeals are dismissed – subject to the above condition.

¶73

(DINESH MEHTA),J (S. RAVINDRA BHAT),CJ

¶74

59-77-skm/-

Dr. Naresh Sanklecha v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Naresh Sanklecha v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmi Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Sharda Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Vs State of Rajasthan

Shishpal Vs State and Ors.

Dr. Praveen Garg Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Dr. Ajay Singhal Vs State and Ors.