In D.B. Habeas Corpus No. 47/2019, the High Court of Rajasthan held that the missing petitioner's husband was produced in court seeking to return home. Consequently, the Court found nothing to consider, discharged the rule, and disposed of the petition.
Rule discharged and petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus No. 47/2019
Seema Bhati W/o Anil Bhati, Aged About 35 Years, By Caste Bhati Ghanchi, Resident Of Plot No. 38, Lane No. 1, Milkman Colony, Pal Road, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Judgment / Order
02/04/2019
The alleged missing person Anil Bhati, husband of the petitioner has been produced in the Court. He submits that he had been misled into leaving in his home and now, he wants to return to his house and reside with his wife.
(2 of 2)
[HC-47/2019]
In this background, nothing survives for consideration of this Court in this habeas corpus petition, which is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
13-1/-
Sudhir Asopa
Seema Bhati
State Of Rajasthan
Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur
Sho Of Shastri Nagar Police Station, District Jodhpur
Chaman Sharma
Kum Rashmi
SANDEEP MEHTA
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
