Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Shamta Jain Vs Union of India — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2019)

Home
Rajasthan HC
2019
Shamta Jain Vs Union of IndiaShamta Jain v. Union of India

Dismissed

Shamta Jain v. Union of India

Rajasthan HC1 Apr 2019CW/2639/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition regarding transfer cancellation was withdrawn after petitioner undertook to submit a representation to the competent authority.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

D.B. Civil Writ No. 2639/2019

Smt. Shamta Jain W/o Shri Ashish Bhandari, Aged About 32 Years, R/o H-32, Bakhtawar Ji Ka Bagh, Opposite Kankariya Building, Jodhpur.

----Petitioner

Versus

Union Of India, Through The Chief Executive Officer, Directorate Of Administration And H.r., Khadi And Village Industries Commission, 3, Irla Road, Vile Parle (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra.

The Joint Chief Executive Officer, Directorate Of Administration And H.r., Khadi And Village Industries Commission, 3, Irla Road, Vile Parle (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra.

The Director, Dso, Khadi And Village Industries Commission, Jodhpur, Camp Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Director, Divisional Office, Kissan Bhawan, Sriganganagar Road, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

Mr. Badri Lal Meena, Director, Dso, Khadi And Village Industries Commission, Jodhpur. Camp Jaipur, Director, Divisional Office, Kissan Bhawan, Sriganganagar Road, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Smt. Shamta Jain W/o Shri Ashish Bhandari
respondent
Union Of India, Through The Chief Executive Officer, Directorate Of Administration And H.r., Khadi And Village Industries Commission, Mumbai
respondent
The Joint Chief Executive Officer, Directorate Of Administration And H.r., Khadi And Village Industries Commission, Mumbai
respondent
Mr. Badri Lal Meena, Director, Dso, Khadi And Village Industries Commission, Jodhpur

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Rajasthan HC
Decided on: 1 Apr 2019 · April
Registered: 20 Feb 2019
Case no.: CW/2639/2019

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Sandeep Mehta Vinit Kumar Mathur

Ajeet Singh Vs State of Rajasthan
27 Mar 2019
Lobha Vs State of Rajasthan
27 Mar 2019
Punia @ Puna Vs State of Rajasthan
27 Mar 2019
Pema Ram Vs State of Rajasthan
1 Apr 2019

Cite this judgement

Shamta Jain v. Union of India, CW/2639/2019 (RJ), decided on 1 April 2019.

The High Court of Rajasthan publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Sandip Mehta and Vinit Kumar Mathur

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Petitioner approached High Court seeking cancellation of transfer. Counsel withdrew writ petition undertaking to submit representation to competent authority for revocation. Court observed that representation must be considered objectively and decided within two weeks. Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Nupur Bhati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Mathur Mr. Rahul Roy

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Judgment / Order

01/04/2019

After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner Dr. Nupur Bhati requested that the petitioner may

(2 of 2)

[CW-2639/2019]

be allowed to approach the competent authority by a representation for seeking cancellation of her transfer/transfer to any other suitable place and the competent authority in turn, may be directed to consider and decide such representation as per law within a specified time frame. With this liberty, she seeks to withdraw the instant writ petition.

Learned counsel for the respondents representing the respondents do not object to the said request made on behalf of the petitioner.

In this background, without entering into the merits of the case, we hereby observe that in case the petitioner submits a representation to the competent authority for revocation of her transfer/transfer to any other suitable place within next ten days, such representation shall be considered in an objective and sympathetic manner and shall be decided by a reasoned order within two weeks from the submission thereof.

With these observations, the instant writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

(SANDEEP MEHTA),J

30-praveen/-

Coram

AI extract

Sandip Mehta
Vinit Kumar Mathur

CNR

RJHC010112172019

Topic

Service and Employment

Bench

Sandeep Mehta Vinit Kumar Mathur

Disposal

DISPOSED OF

Madan Lal Vs State

1 Apr 2019

Mahendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

1 Apr 2019