The Court below while declining the application seeking amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC specifically took note of the fact that in the plaint, the petitioner-plaintiffs specifically pleaded about the fact of land acquisition on 7th July, 1988, and award made on 25th July, 1991. There is no pleading as to compensation was not paid to the petitioners in the plaint. That part, the petitioners pleaded to the effect that forged pattas were created, and therefore, prayed for grant of temporary injunction. The notification in reference to which prayer for amendment was addressed, did not reflect the fact that the land involved herein was not acquired. Further, the petitioners in the plaint specifically pleaded that an award was made and there is no pleading with reference to compensation. The Court below also took a specific note of the fact that no reasons were detailed out in the application for the inordinate and unexplained delay in institution of the application seeking amendment.