Disposed

Mahala Institute of Ayurveda v. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University

Rajasthan HC6 Feb 2019CW/58/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed connected writ petitions filed by three Ayurveda institutes challenging university actions. Directing the respondent University to proceed expeditiously under Academic Council authorization, the court disposed of the applications without detailed reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Respondent University directed to proceed further and take decisions expeditiously within a fortnight; writ applications disposed of.

Mahala Institute of Ayurveda Vs Dr. Sarvepalli… — Education and Admissions | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writs No. 58/2019

¶3

Mahala Institute Of Ayurveda, A Unit Of Shree Shyam Shikshan Sansthan, Khatushyam Ji Road, Reengus, Sikar, Through Its Secretary Vishal Mahala Son Of Bhagirath Mahala, Age 42 Years, Resident Of B-5 Jamunapuri, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Karwar, Nagaur Road, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Civil Writs No. 59/2019

¶10

Shekhawati Institute Of Ayurveda, Behind Circuit House , Jaipur Road, Sikar, Through Its Secretary Snehlata W/o Ranjeet Singh , Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of B-5, Todi Nagar, Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Karwar, Nagaur Road, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

S.B. Civil Writs No. 62/2019

¶16

Smt. Ramkumari Institute Of Ayurveda, Mukundgarh Mandi, Jhunjhunu, Through Its Secretary Raman Kumar Son Of Shri Shubhkaran Choudhary, Age 45 Years, Resident Of Mukundgarh Mandi, District Jhunjhunu.

¶17

----Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Karwar, Nagaur Road, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶20

----Respondent

¶21

S.B. Civil Writs No. 65/2019

¶22

Mahala Institute Of Ayurveda, A Unit Of Shree Shyam Shikshan Sansthan, Khatushyam Ji Road, Reengus, Sikar, Through Its Secretary Vishal Mahala Son Of Bhagirath Mahala, Age 42 Years,

¶23

(2 of 3)

¶24

[CW-58/2019]

¶25

Resident Of B-5 Jamunapuri, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur.

¶26

----Petitioner

¶27

Versus

¶28

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Karwar, Nagaur Road, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶29

----Respondent

¶30

S.B. Civil Writs No. 154/2019

¶31

Shekhawati Institute Of Ayurveda, Behind Circuit House , Jaipur Road, Sikar, Through Its Secretary Snehlata W/o Ranjeet Singh , Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of B-5, Todi Nagar, Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶32

Versus

¶33

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Karwar, Nagaur Road, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶34

----Respondent

¶35

S.B. Civil Writs No. 155/2019

¶36

Smt. Ramkumari Institute Of Ayurveda, Mukundgarh Mandi, Jhunjhunu, Through Its Secretary Raman Kumar Son Of Shri Shubhkaran Choudhary, Age 45 Years, Resident Of Mukundgarh Mandi, District Jhunjhunu.

¶37

----Petitioner

¶38

Versus

¶39

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Karwar, Nagaur Road, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶40

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Poonia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yuraj Samant

¶41

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶42

Order

¶43

06/02/2019

¶44

Referring to proceedings drawn on 24^th January, 2019, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the Academic

¶45

(3 of 3)

¶46

[CW-58/2019]

¶47

Council has authorized the Vice Chancellor to proceed further with the matter. This factual matrix is not disputed by the counsel for the respondent-University.

¶48

In view of the above and limited prayer addressed; respondents are directed to proceed further in view of the recommendations made by Academic Council authorizing the Vice Chancellor to take the decision.

¶49

Needful be done as expeditiously as possible; preferably, within a fortnight from the date a certified copy of this order is presented.

¶50

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ applications stand disposed off.

¶51

A copy of this order be placed in each of connected file.

¶52

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J

¶53

Pooja/170-175

Mahala Institute of Ayurveda v. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahala Institute of Ayurveda v. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Singh Rathore S/O Shri Ummed Singh Rathore Vs Rohit Kumar Singh (I.a.S.) Principal Secretary Medical and Health Department

Sanwar Mal Gurjar S/O Shri Ram Sharan Gurjar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Tejpal Singh S/O Shri Jagdish Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahala Institute of Ayurveda Vs Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University

Smt. Ramkumari Institute of Ayurveda Vs Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University

Shekhawati Institute of Ayurveda Vs Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University