In a writ petition concerning retired employees' dues, the High Court allowed the petition by relying on its earlier judgment Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. (2015).
Reimbursement of entire dues of retired employees within six months with interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17209/2019
Madho Singh Charan S/o Shri Ram Karan, Aged About 61 Years, B/c Charan, R/o Plot No. 128, Hanvant-A, Gali No. 6, BJS, Jodhpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Harish Purohit
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
20/11/2019
Issue notice.
A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Harish Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman &
(2 of 2)
[CW-17209/2019]
Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.
This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra) directed as under :-
“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.
No order as to costs.”
In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
39-SanjayS/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition pending before the High Court should be allowed in light of the judgment in Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors.
What directions should be issued to the respondent Corporation for the reimbursement of retired employees' dues.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors.Followed¶20
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015
Madho Singh Charan
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
