Petitioners challenged the validity of Section 4(g) of PESA Act, 1996 mandating reservation of Chairperson seats for Scheduled Tribes in Scheduled Areas. The court dismissed the petition relying on the Supreme Court decision in Rakesh Kumar's case.
Writ petition dismissed relying on Supreme Court decision in Rakesh Kumar's case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16662/2019
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mathur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Judgment
18/12/2019
(2 of 2) [CW-16662/2019]
(PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
48-Aditya/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Section 4(g) of PESA Act, 1996 providing for reservation of seats of Chairpersons of Panchayats for Scheduled Tribes in Scheduled Areas is valid.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kumar & Ors.Relied on¶1
(2010) 4 SCC 50 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Joshi & Ors.
Ministry of Law And Justice & Ors.
Sangeet Lodha
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
