Partly allowed

Purshotam Sharma S/O Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma B/C Brahmin v. Sheela Sharma W/O Purshotam Sharma D/O Satyanarayan Sharma B/C Brahman

Rajasthan HC6 Aug 2019CRLR/82/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court passed an interim protection order under Section 1269 of the 2017 Act quashing a lower court's interim order and referring the S.B. Criminal Revision Petition to the High Court for a full trial, rejecting objections regarding dismissal. Both parties are listed to appear on a specific date.

What did the court decide?

The interim order passed under Section 1269 of the 2017 Act is vacated; the S.B. Criminal Revision Petition is referred to the High Court for trial.

Purshotam Sharma S/O Shri Mahesh Chand… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

S.B.Criminal Revision Petition No. 82/2019

¶2

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA

¶4

vkns'k

¶5

S.B.Cri. Revision Petition No. 82/2019

¶6

Purshotam Sharma S/o Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma B/c Brahmin, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Plot No 40 Radha Vihar Colony Shyopur Road Saganer Jaipur

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

Sheela Sharma W/o Purshotam Sharma D/o Satyanarayan Sharma B/c Brahman, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Plot No 26 Chanakayapuri Vistar Jagatpur Jaipur

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

mifLFkr

¶12

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶13

;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh iwue pan HkaMkjhA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh iz'kkar 'kekZA v;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh lh ih 'kekZA

¶14

%% vkns'k fnukad %% 06-8-2019

¶15

U;k;ky; }kjk %&

¶16

v/khuLFk U;k;ky; U;k;k/kh'k] ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] dze&1] t;iqj }kjk izdj.k la[;k 1269@2017 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 10-12-2018 ] ftlds rgr ,di{kh; vkns'k fnukad 27-3-2017 ,oa fu.kZ; fnukad 5-5-2017 dks fujLr fd;s tkus ds dze esa izLrqr izkFkZuk

¶17

¶18

S.B.Criminal Revision Petition No. 82/2019

¶19

i= [kkfjt fd;k x;k] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk is'k dh x;h gSA

¶20

;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd ;kph dks i;kZIr rkehy ugha gksus ds cktown Hkh v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk mldh rkehy i;kZIr ekudj ds ,di{kh; vkns'k dks ;Fkkor j[kk x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd ;kph dks lquokbZ dk i;kZIr volj fn;k tkuk vko';d Fkk] tks fd ugha fn;k x;k gSA vr% iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkdj izdj.k dks xq.kkoxq.k ij lquokbZ gsrq v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkosA

¶21

v;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku jgk fd iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkdj izdj.k dks xq.kkoxq.k ij lquokbZ gsrq v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS rks mUgsa dksbZ vkifRr ugha gSA

¶22

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fof/kuqlkj vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶23

lquk x;k ,oa fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶24

Lohd`r :i ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 10-12-2018 ftlds rgr ,di{kh; vkns'k fnukad 27-3-2017 ,oa fu.kZ; fnukad 5-5-2017 dks fujLr fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph }kjk rkehy ds dze esa U;k;ky; ds le{k tks rF; izdV fd;s x;s gS ,oa muds dze esa v;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij cgl ugha dj izdj.k ds 'kh?kzkfr'kh?kz fuLrkj.k fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k dks vikLr dj izdj.k v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks fof/kuqlkj iqu% lquokbZ gsrq izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶25

S.B.Criminal Revision Petition No. 82/2019

¶26

mijksDrkuqlkj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk vkaf'kd :Ik ls Lohdkj dj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 10-12-2018 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS vkSj bl funsZ'k ds lkFk izdj.k iqu% v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd nksuksa i{kksa dks lqudj iqu% fof/kuqlkj U;k;ksfpr vkns'k ikfjr djsA

¶27

v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; izdj.k dk tgka rd laHko gks lds 'kh?kzkfr'kh?kz rhu ekg esa fuLrkj.k djs ,oa izdj.k esa 15 fnol ls vf/kd dh rkjh[k is'kh ugha nh tk,A

¶28

nksuksa i{k fnukad 30-8-2019 dks v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr jgsA

¶29

mijksDr funsZ'k ds lkFk iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk ,oa ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA

¶30

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶31

,e 'kekZ@62

Purshotam Sharma S/O Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma B/C Brahmin v. Sheela Sharma W/O Purshotam Sharma D/O Satyanarayan Sharma B/C Brahman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purshotam Sharma S/O Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma B/C Brahmin v. Sheela Sharma W/O Purshotam Sharma D/O Satyanarayan Sharma B/C Brahman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Keshari Singh S/O Shri Nihal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Darshan Singh Vs District Excise Officer Swaimadhopur

Mojiram S/O Shri Mahaveer Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Karan Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Geegraj S/O Ramdev Vs State of Rajasthan

Raman Lal S/O Papaiyaram B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan