This petition challenges the High Court's suo motu recall of a suo motu order granting anticipatory bail and imposing bail conditions, relying on Article 348 of the Constitution of India for language translation purposes, though the specific facts are in Hindi.
Quashing of the High Court's suo motu recall order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1104/2019
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA
vkns'k
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1104/2019
Geegraj S/o Ramdev, B/c Mali R/o Khetri Dist. Jhunjhunu Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
2
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1104/2019
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh vkj ,l Hkkj}ktA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh iz'kkar 'kekZA
%% vkns'k fnukd %% 06-8-2019a
v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky;] vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] [ksrMh] ftyk >qa>qauw }kjk QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k& 398@2002 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 24-5-2018] ftlds rgr v;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 147] 341] 323 o 336 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, vFkZn.M ls nafMr fd;k x;k gS ,oa vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M vf/kdre lkr fnol ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k& 80@2018 v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] [ksrMh }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 2-3-2019 ds rgr [kkfjt dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&ifjoknh dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdZ lqus x;sA
;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk v;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vkjksfir vijk/k esa nks"kh djkj fn;k tkdj ek= vFkZn.M o vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M vf/kdre lkr fnol ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nafMr fd;k x;k gS] tks vR;f/kd de gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M ltk Hkh U;qure nh xbZ gSA nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fof/k ds izko/kkuksa ds izfrdwy gSA vr% iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkosA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr rdksZa dk fojks/k fd;kA
3
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1104/2019
lquk x;k ,oa fopkj fd;k x;kA
izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ,oa nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ;ksa ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us v;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 147] 341] 323 o 336 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vijk/k esa nks"kh ekuk gS rFkk mDr vijk/kksa ds dze esa v;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vFkZn.M ls nafMr fd;k x;k gS ,oa vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M vf/kdre lkr fnol ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA mDRk vijk/kksa esa vFkZn.M ls nafMr fd;s tkus dk Hkh izko/kku gS ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us v;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vFkZn.M ls nafMr dj dksbZ =qfV dkfjr ugha dh gS ,oa vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M ltk ds dze esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk foosdkf/kdkj gSA
bl U;k;ky; ds er esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 24-5-2018 ,oa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 02-3-2019 esa ,slh dksbZ =qfV izrhr ugha gksrh gS ftlls fd mlesa gLr{ksi fd;k tk ldsA
mijksDrkuqlkj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh
tkrh gSA
;g vkns'[email protected]; vkt fnukad 06-8-2019 dks Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 348 ¼i½ ds rgr Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk jkti= la[;k& 1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 ,oa jktLFkku jkti= fnukafdr 10-3-1971 ds rgr fgUnh Hkk"kk ds iz;ksx dks izkf/kd`r fd;s tkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i fgUnh Hkk"kk esa fy[kk;k x; kA ftldk dk;kZy; }kjk iznRr vuqoknd ls vaxzsth Hkk"kk esa vuqokn djokdj izekf.kr izfr tkjh dh tk,A
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
,e 'kekZ@&71
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court has the power to recall a suo motu order under Article 148 of the Constitution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Geegraj
State Of Rajasthan
Indraj
Smt. Premli
Roshan Lal
Chandrajeet
J. Tej Ram
J. Shobha Medad Sharma
J. Indrajit Bagchi Sarkar
Ms. C.J. Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
