The High Court allowed two criminal revision petitions after parties entered a compromise before a Mega Lok Adalat, quashing lower court orders and compounding the offence.
Revision petitions allowed, orders passed by courts below quashed, and the offence compounded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 80/2014
Darshan singh s/o Hansram Gurjar, r/o sundarpura Baduwa, tehsil and district Karauli, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
The District excise officer, sawai madhopur through sohanpal verma s/o shri Rattram, District excise officer, sawai madhopur, rajasthan
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 81/2014
Darshan singh s/o Hansram Gurjar, r/o sundarpura Baduwa, tehsil and district Karauli, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
The District excise officer, sawai madhopur through sohanpal verma s/o shri Rattram, District excise officer, sawai madhopur, rajasthan
| ----Respondent | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Rajneesh Gupta | |
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Nikhil Simlote for Mr. R.B. Mathur |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
05/08/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLR80/2014]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Simple Kumawat /54-55
Darshan singh s/o Hansram Gurjar
The District excise officer, sawai madhopur
PANKAJ BHANDARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
