Disposed

Kishna Ram v. State

Rajasthan HC7 Jan 2019CRLMP/4612/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jodhpur disposed of a quashing petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an assurance from the Public Prosecutor. The Court directed the investigating authority to consider a representation to be filed by the petitioners within ten days before completing the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of the petition with a direction to the investigating authority to consider a representation to be filed within ten days.

Kishna Ram Vs State — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4612/2018

¶3

Kishna Ram S/o Sadram, Aged About 48 Years, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident Of Village Ramwas, Koja, Tehsil And P.s. Dhorimana, District Barmer.

¶4

Om Prakash S/o Babu Lal, Aged About 23 Years, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident Of Village Ramwas, Koja, Tehsil And P.s. Dhorimana, District Barmer.

¶5

Kalu Ram S/o Hema Ram, Aged About 40 Years, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident Of Village Ramwas, Koja, Tehsil And P.s. Dhorimana, District Barmer.

¶6

Shrawan S/o Sad Ram, Aged About 25 Years, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident Of Village Ramwas, Koja, Tehsil And P.s. Dhorimana, District Barmer.

¶7

Babu Lal S/o Hema Ram, Aged About 47 Years, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident Of Village Ramwas, Koja, Tehsil And P.s. Dhorimana, District Barmer.

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State, Through Pp

¶11

Dharmendra Singh Jatav S/o Parikshit Singh, Constable P.s. Dhorimana, District Barmer.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. L.R. Punia For Respondent(s) : Mr. MS Panwar, Public Prosecutor

¶14

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶15

Order

¶16

07/01/2019

¶17

The petitioners preferred this misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.298/2018 lodged at P.S. Dhorimana, District Barmer for the offence under Sections 143, 452, 353 and 332 IPC.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-4612/2018]

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioners want to submit a representation alongwith all the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioners submit a representation alongwith all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the investigation.

¶21

In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the petitioners submit a representation alongwith all the necessary documents before it within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided before completing the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶22

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

¶23

Sanjay

Kishna Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishna Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Modi Vs State of Rajasthan

Raj Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ruksar Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Manisha Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Safi Mohd. Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajpal Vs State