Disposed

Ruksar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Jan 2019CRLMP/31/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in a criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. directed petitioners to appear before SHO to analyze threats against their life and liberty arising from opposition to their marriage, without treating this order as proof of age or affecting civil/criminal proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction to SHO to ensure vigilance for life and liberty of petitioners and hear their grievance to analyze threat perceptions.

Ruksar Vs State of Rajasthan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 31/2019

¶3

Ruksar Spouse/o Sajid, Aged About 20 Years, D/o Riyaj Khan Muslim, R/o Barkat Colony, Aakhaliya Circle, Jodhpur Now R/o Opp. New Kohinoor, Bapu Colony, Chopasani Road, Jodhpur Raj

¶4

Sajid S/o Mohammed Sabir Muslim, Aged About 31 Years, Opp. New Kohinoor, Bapu Colony, Chopasani Road, Jodhpur Raj.

¶5

----Petitioners Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Jaipur, Raj.

¶7

The Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur

¶8

The Additional Commissioner Of Police (West), Jodhpur 4. Station House Officer, Ps Pratapnagar, Dist Jodhpur 5. Riyaj Khan S/o Ramjan Khan Muslim, Barkat Colony, Aakhaliya Circle, Jodhpur.

¶9

Mumtaj Spouse/o Riyaj Khan Muslim, Barkat Colony, Aakhaliya Circle, Jodhpur.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Wahid For Respondent(s) : Mr. VS Rajpurohit, PP

¶12

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶13

Order

¶14

04/01/2019

¶15

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of respondents

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMP-31/2019]

¶18

5 and 6, in view of solemnization of their marriage with each other on 02.01.2019.

¶19

After hearing the petitioners present in person and on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because marriage is not acceptable. Thus, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the Station House Officer, Police Station Pratapnagar, District Jodhpur, who shall hear the grievance of the petitioners and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if required so, may pass necessary orders.

¶20

Consequently, the present misc. petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Pratapnagar, District Jodhpur to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to the marriage.

¶21

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age and the marriage of the petitioners and any observations in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners at the instances of their relatives.

¶22

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶23

161-Sudheer/-

Ruksar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ruksar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sajjan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay Vashishth Vs State

Chetan and Anr. Vs State

Sunil Kumar Modi Vs State of Rajasthan

Raj Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Kumar Vs Abhay Kumar