Sunil Kumar Modi Vs State of Rajasthan

Petitioner has preferred this misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR No.231/2018 lodged at Police Station Suratgarh City, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 3 & 7 of Essential Commodity Act, 1955.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner wants to submit a representation alongwith all the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority to redress the issue.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioner submits a representation along with all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the investigation.

¶15

In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-39/2019]

¶17

petitioner submits a representation along with all the necessary documents before it within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided before completing the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶18

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶19

160-Sudheer/-

Sunil Kumar Modi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Modi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sajjan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay Vashishth Vs State

Chetan and Anr. Vs State

Raj Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ruksar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Kumar Vs Abhay Kumar