Allowed

Yellow Tie Hospitality Management Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Dec 2019CRLMP/4458/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court quashed the FIR and allowed the criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after recording the fact that the parties had settled their dispute via compromise and the petitioners paid Rs.19,50,000 to the complainant.

What did the court decide?

The First Information Report No.353/2019 was quashed, and the stay application was disposed of.

Yellow Tie Hospitality Management Ltd. Vs State of… — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4458/2019

¶3

Yellow Tie Hospitality Management Ltd., Through Karan Raj Jayendra Bhai Tann (Formerly Yellow Tie Hospitality Management Llp)

¶4

Karan Raj Jayendra Bhai Tanna S/o Jayendra Bhai Tanna, Aged About 31 Years, B/c Thakkar.

¶5

Kamish Modi S/o Shri Chandrakant Modi, B/c Modi, aged about 44 years.

¶6

Nikita Thakur D/o Jitendra Thakur, Aged About 27 Years, B/c Thakur, All R/o -C/o F-89/11 Okhla Phase-1, New Delhi-110020 123 Through Its Authorized Official Karan Tanna.

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

¶10

Mr. Amit Madan S/o Sh. Balveer Nath Madan, R/o 1-D-9, Vigyan Nagar, Kota City, Rajasthan.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ajay Sharma with Ms. Shilpa Sharma.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S.S. Ola, P.P.
For Complainant	Mr. Rajneesh Gupta.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶14

Order

¶15

12/12/2019

¶16

Instant criminal Miscellaneous petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the First Information Report No.353/2019 registered at Police Station Gumanpura District Kota (City) for the offence under Sections 406 & 420 of IPC.

¶17

Counsel for the petitioners submitted that during pendency of the proceedings before this court the petitioners and complainant have settled their dispute by way of compromise. Counsel further submits that the petitioners have already paid

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-4458/2019]

¶20

Rs.19,50,000/- to the complainant vide bankers cheque dated 30.09.2019. A copy of the same is taken on record.

¶21

Counsel for the respondent no.2-complainant has not disputed this fact regarding receiving the payment of Rs.19,50,000/- by the complainant.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the parties have entered into a compromise, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the First Information Report No.353/2019 registered at Police Station Gumanpura District Kota (City) is hereby quashed.

¶23

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶24

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶25

MG/06

Yellow Tie Hospitality Management Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yellow Tie Hospitality Management Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahabuddin S/O Sh. Amar Singh B/C Mev Vs State of Rajasthan

Satish Kumar S/O Shri Shrichand B/C Ahir Vs State of Rajasthan

M/S Gadh Ganesh Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs Shrikant Sharma

Pooja Sharma D/O Shri Banwari Lal Sharma B/C Jangid Vs State of Rajasthan

Sujit Kumar S/O Shri Jaldir Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Kumar Chhandak S/O Shri Laxmi Narayan Chhandak B/C Khatik Vs State of Rajasthan