Dismissed

Harish Panwar Urf Arjun Panwar v. Neetu

Rajasthan HC19 Nov 2019CRLMP/330/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner husband challenged interim maintenance order of Rs. 2,500/- per month awarded to wife and minor daughter. High Court rejected challenge, finding no perversity, and directed trial court to decide main application within six months.

What did the court decide?

Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed; main maintenance application directed to be decided within six months.

Harish Panwar Urf Arjun Panwar Vs Neetu — Maintenance and Alimony | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 330/2019

¶3

Harish Panwar @ Arjun Panwar S/o Late Sh. Kishore Panwar, Aged About 36 Years, B/c Damami , Niwasi B- 15, Ganglav Talab , Hanuman Chowk Shahar , Jodhpur

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Neetu W/o Sh. Harish Panwar D/o Sh . Radheshyam Dangi, Aged About 31 Years, B/c Damami Niwasigan Niwargaro Ka Mohalla , Ganglav Talab K Paas, Jodhpur

¶7

Rani D/o Sh. Arjun Panwar, Aged About 4 Years, Minor Through Natural Wali Mata Smt. Neetu Panwar W/o Sh. Harish Panwar ,b/c Damami Niwasigan Niwargaro Ka Mohalla , Ganglav Talab K Paas, Jodhpur

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Praveen Dayal Dave
For Respondent(s)	:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Judgment / Order

¶11

19/11/2019

¶12

The instant misc petition has been filed by the petitionerhusband against the order dated 27.04.2017, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate No.1, Jodhpur Metropolitan whereby interim maintenance of Rs.2,500/- per month was awarded in favour of respondents. The petitioner challenged the said order in appeal before the learned Additional Session Judge (Women Atrocity Cases), Jodhpur Metropolitan which was also dismissed on 05.12.2018.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner-husband submits that the learned trial court without appreciating the material available on record

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMP-330/2019]

¶16

and without assigning any cogent reason has awarded interim maintenance in favour of the respondents. Counsel further submits that the interim maintenance as awarded by the trial court is on higher side as the petitioner-husband is not having enough income, therefore the same may be reduced appropriately.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-husband and perused the impugned orders passed by the courts below.

¶18

The impugned order passed by the learned trial court is an interim order. The final order on the application is yet to be passed by the trial court. The learned trial court after taking into consideration all the material available before it, has rightly awarded interim maintenance of Rs.2,500/- per month in favour of respondents which was also affirmed by the appellate court. The orders impugned do not suffer from any illegality and perversity, hence, no interference is called for from this Court.

¶19

The criminal misc. petition stand disposed of accordingly. The trial court is directed to decide the main application after taking into consideration all the documents and material aspect of the matter as well as statements so recorded before it, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶20

Stay petition also decided accordingly.

¶21

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶22

93-MS/-

Harish Panwar Urf Arjun Panwar v. Neetu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harish Panwar Urf Arjun Panwar v. Neetu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Vs State

Narendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Swarna Kalra Vs State

Chenaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandradev Rahi Vs State of Rajasthan