This single-judge order dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition for quashing an FIR because a report from the In-Charging police indicated the case had proceeded to filing of a challan, rendering the petition infructuous. The stay application was also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2531/2019
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Baghela For Respondent(s) : Mr. Muktiyar Khan, PP Mr. MS Amrawat
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Judgment / Order
18/11/2019
The instant misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.83/2019, PS Women Police Station, District Jodhpur City (West) for offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323 IPC.
Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a report dated 15.11.2019 received from the SHO, PS Women Police Station, District Jodhpur City (West) wherein it has been mentioned that after thorough investigation, Police is going to file challan against accused Pankaj Sharma. The said report is hereby taken on record.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present misc. petition has become infructuous and dismissed accordingly.
Stay application also dismissed.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
346-MS/-
Narendra Kumar
Smt. Rajkumari
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Jaya
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
