Mukesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a second bail application by the accused in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, and 326/34 IPC. The High Court granted bail without expressing an opinion on the merits.
What did the court decide?
Directed release on bail on execution of personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 9035/2019
Mukesh S/o Purkha Ram, Aged About 28 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Chak 19 Jmd Badrasar, Teh. And Dist. Bikaner. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bikaner)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreekant Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
01/08/2019
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail ought to be granted to the accused in the所述第二 bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukesh S/o Purkha Ram
- respondent
State
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/9035/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court