Allowed

Rajuram @ Rajiya v. State

Rajasthan HC1 Aug 2019CRLMB/9074/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur allowed bail applications filed by two accused persons arrested in connection with offences under Sections 379/34 IPC, directing them to execute a personal bond with sureties under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Directed that petitioners shall be released on bail to execute a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 25,000 each for appearance before the trial court.

Rajuram @ Rajiya Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9072/2019

¶4

Daluram S/o Sh. Khetaram, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Suthar, R/o Village Khadin, Teh. Ramsar, Dist. Barmer. (Lodged At Central Jail, Jodhpur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9074/2019

¶11

Rajuram @ Rajiya S/o Sh. Chogaram, Aged About 25 Years, B/c Vishnoi, R/o Bhatip, Police Thana Karada, Dist. Jalore (Raj.) (Petitioner Is Lodged At Central Jail, Jodhpur)

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

	Versus
State, Through Pp	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶15

Judgment / Order

¶16

01/08/2019

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶18

The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.07/2019 of Police Station GRP Barmer, District GRP Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 379/34 IPC. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶20

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-9072/2019]

¶21

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶22

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners Daluram S/o Sh. Khetaram and Rajuram @ Rajiya S/o Sh. Chogaram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.07/2019 of Police Station GRP Barmer, District GRP Jodhpur provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶23

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶24

SURABHII/124-125-

Rajuram @ Rajiya v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajuram @ Rajiya v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Regar Vs State

Ramsanehi Vs State

Nitlesh Sharma Vs State

Ramesh Vs State

Ganpatlal Vs State

Noratmal @ Navratan Vs State