The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. but did not argue on merits, resulting in the application being dismissed as not pressed at that stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8823/2019
Raghunath @ Rughnatharam S/o Kishnaram, Aged About 27 Years, B/c Sihag Vishnoi, R/o Jambeshwar Mandir Ke Pas, Meghava, Police Thana Chitalwana, District Jalore (Raj.) (Presently Lodged At Sub Jail Bali)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Khichar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
25/07/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner, without arguing on merits, has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application at this stage.
Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
Abhishek Kumar S.No.79
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raghunath @ Rughnatharam
State of Rajasthan
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
