Counsel for the petitioner abstained from arguing on merits. The High Court dismissed the bail application as it was not pressed by the petitioner at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6431/2019
Heera Lal S/o Sh. Hari Shankar, Aged About 22 Years, B/c Suthar, R/o Village Majavad, P.s. Gogunda, Dist. Udaipur (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shambhoo Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Bhati, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
25/07/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner, without arguing on merits, has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application at this stage.
Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
4-Babulal/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Heera Lal
State Of Rajasthan
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
