In bail application where counsel stated petitioner was enlarged on bail under Section 439 CrPC, the High Court dismissed the application as infructuous.
Bail application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5700/2019
Satbir S/o Mamraj, Aged About 38 Years, By Caste Kumhar, Resident Of Chanduwada, Narnaul, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh, (Haryana)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta. For Respondent : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP for the State.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY CHATURVEDI (VACATION JUDGE)
Order
10/06/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present bail application has become infructuous as the petitioner has been arrested and he has already been enlarged on bail under section 439 Cr.PC.
In view of statement so made, the present bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ABHAY CHATURVEDI (VACATION JUDGE)
74-Anil Singh/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satbir
State Of Rajasthan
Abhay Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
