Allowed

Pradeep Sharma v. Shilpi Saxena and Anr.

Rajasthan HC2 May 2019CRLLA/177/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court recalled its order quashing a summons under Section 138 NI Act. The bench set aside the earlier ruling which had held the summons invalid due to alleged procedural lapses and failure to address demand notice genuineness or discrepancies in interest rates, thereby allowing the leave to appeal petition.

What did the court decide?

Recalled the impugned order of quashing the summons and restored the appeal for hearing.

Pradeep Sharma Vs Shilpi Saxena and Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

S.B. Cri. Leave to Appeal No. 177/2018 Pradeep Sharma Vs. Shilpi Saxena & Anr.

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA

¶4

%% vkns'k %%

¶5

S.B. Cri. Leave to Appeal No. 177/2018

¶6

Pradeep Sharma S/o Late Sitaram Sharma, Legal Heir Of Deceased Complainant Sitaram Sharma B/c Brahm, R/o House No.956, Dariba Paan, Jaipur, Raj.

¶7

----Complainant/Appellant Versus

¶8

Shilpi Saxena D/o Shri Sharat Chand Saxena B/c Kayasth, R/o House No.762, Jamuna Bhawan, Dariba Paan, Jaipur, Raj.

¶9

---Accused/Respondent

¶10

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp.

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

%% mifLFkr %%

¶13

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶14

vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh lat; oekZA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh iz'kkUr 'kekZA

¶15

vkns'k fnukad 02-05-2019

¶16

U;k;ky; }kjk %&

¶17

vihykFkhZ&ifjoknh dh vksj ls v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&17] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk QkStnkjh vihy la[;k &64@2017 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 21-032018] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dj v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds

¶18

¶19

S.B. Cri. Leave to Appeal No. 177/2018 Pradeep Sharma Vs. Shilpi Saxena & Anr.

¶20

fu.kZ; fnukad 26-04-2017 dks vikLr djrs gq, izR;FkhZ dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fyf[kr vf/kfu;e ls nks"keqDr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) vihykFkhZ&ifjoknh dh vksj ls vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk is'k dh xbZ gSA

¶21

cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&ifjoknh dk dFku jgk fd lacaf/kr pSd ij izR;FkhZ ds gLrk{kj gksuk fookfnr ugha gSA mudk dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ek= jkf'k ds lzksr ij vfo'okl djrs gq, ifjokn [kkfjt fd;k x;k gS] tcfd ifjoknh ds lsokfuo`Rr gksus ds i'pkr lacaf/kr jkf'k lu~ 2004 esa m/kkj fn;k tkuk ,oa mlds laca/k esa pSd lu~ 2008 esa fn;k tkuk izekf.kr gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us nksuksa i{kksa ds laca/k o vko';drk ds vuqlkj m/kkj nh xbZ jkf'k ds rF;ksa ij /;ku ugha nsdj fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA vr% vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶22

fopkj fd;k x;kA vfHkys[k ,oa vk{ksfir fu.kZ; dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa lhrkjke dh vksj ls ifjokn izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk] rRi'pkr lhrkjke dh e`R;q gksus ls] mlds iq= iznhi 'kekZ dks ifjoknh ds LFkku ij izfrLFkkfir fd;k x;k gS ,oa izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls tkjh pSd la[;k&4651763 fnukafdr 15-02-2008 jkf'k N% yk[k :i;s dk cSad esa Hkqxrku gsrq izLrqr djus ij] vi;kZIr jkf'k ds vk/kkj ij pSd vuknfjr gksdj ykSVk;s tkus ds i'pkr lacaf/kr vf/kfu;e ds rgr dk;Zokgh dh xbZA

¶23

¶24

S.B. Cri. Leave to Appeal No. 177/2018 Pradeep Sharma Vs. Shilpi Saxena & Anr.

¶25

tgkWa rd jkf'k m/kkj fn;s tkus ds dze esa mYysf[kr rF;ksa dk iz'u gS] lu~ 2004 esa jkf'k m/kkj fn;k tkuk ,oa ml dze esa pSd izn'kZ ih&1 o"kZ 2008 esa tkjh gksuk crk;k x;k gSA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk vius fu.kZ; esa o"kZ 2004 esa nh xbZ jkf'k ds dze esa o"kZ 2008 esa fn;s x;s pSd dks fe;kn ckgj gksuk ekuk gS rFkk blds lkFk&lkFk vk; ds lzksr ckcr lacaf/kr iklcqd bR;kfn vihykFkhZ&ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ugha fd;s tkus ,oa ifjokn esa vafdr rF;ksa ds [k.Mu esa v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls izfrj{kk esa Mh-M-1 ls Mh-M-3 ds ijhf{kr gksus ds rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, mi/kkj.kk dk [k.Mu gksuk ekuk gSA

¶26

bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tgkWa m/kkj nh xbZ jkf'k dh fnukad o vU; fooj.k Li"V ugha gksus rFkk o"kZ 2004 dh jkf'k ds dze esa o"kZ 2008 esa pSd fn;s tkus ds dze esa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk tks fu"d"kZ fn;k x;k gS] mlh fu"d"kZ ds dze esa vihykFkhZ&ifjoknh }kjk vk; ds lzksr dks izekf.kr ugha fd;k x;k gS] tcfd vk; ds lzksr dk [k.Mu izR;FkhZ }kjk izLrqr xokgku ds c;kuksa ls iw.kZ :i ls gksuk izdV gqvk gSA vr% izLrqr vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA

¶27

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

¶28

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶29

Fkkokuh@&

Pradeep Sharma v. Shilpi Saxena and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Sharma v. Shilpi Saxena and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod S/O Shri Chandu B/C Singhiwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rama Agarwal W/O Shri Santosh Kumar Agarwal B/C Mahajan Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Keshari @ Satyanarayan Chauhan, by Caste Chauhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra S/O Braj Lal B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Kamlesh Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Manoj Meena Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp.