The Supreme Court observed that the appeal is strictly the voice of the appellant and no additional matter can be admitted or included beyond the scope of the original appeal.
Additional content allowed to be admitted and claimed in the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 48/2019 Rajendra & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Anr.
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 48/2019
----Accused-Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
2
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 48/2019 Rajendra & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Anr.
vihykFkhZx.k ds vf/koDrk Jh nhid lksuhA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh iz'kkUr 'kekZA
vkns'k fnukd 02-05-2019a
U;k;ky; }kjk %
v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼v-fu-½ izdj.k] >qU>quw }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 30-07-2018] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ifjokfn;k&izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ukjktxh ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj vihykFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 447]323 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 3(1)(x) vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa tutkfr vf/kfu;e ds rgr izlaKku fy;k x;k] ls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls ;g vihy is'k dh xbZ gSA
lquk x;kA ;ksX; vf/koDRkk vihykFkhZx.k us izdV fd;k fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa vHkh vkjksi fojfpr ugha gq, gSa rFkk bl vihy eas mBk;s x;s vk/kkjksa dks v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k cgl vkjksi@vkjksi lkjka'k ds le; mBkus pkgrs gSaA vr% bl NwV ds lkFk QkStnkjh vihy dk fuLrkj.k dj fn;k tk,A
fopkj fd;k x;kA ;g vihy izlaKku vkns'k ds fo:) izLrqr gqbZ gS ,oa vHkh rd vkjksi fojfpr ugha gksuk ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ us izdV fd;k gSA vr% U;k;ky; ds le{k ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k }kjk dh xbZ izkFkZuk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] ;g vihy bl funsZ'k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd bl QkStnkjh vihy esa mBk;s x;s vk/kkjksa dks vihykFkhZx.k v/khuLFk
3
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 48/2019 Rajendra & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Anr.
U;k;ky; ds le{k cgl vkjksi@vkjksi lkjka'k ds le; mBkus dks Lora= gS ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk nksuksa i{kksa dks fof/k vuqlkj vkns'k ikfjr djsA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ls ;fn vihykFkhZx.k Lo;a dks izHkkfor eglwl djrs gSa rks fof/k vuqlkj dk;Zokgh djus dks Lora= gSaA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@&
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the draft appeal admissible to include additional content and claims.
Whether the Supreme Court of India has the power to exercise additional exercise and adjudication in the matter.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajendra S/o Braj Lal
Mukesh S/o Shri Rajendra
Sunil S/o Shri Rajendra
Braj Raj Mishra S/o Shri Satynarayn Mishra
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Ompati W/o Late Shri Hawa Singh
Jh. Usha A.M. Sen
Jh. Vikram Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
