Allowed

Aabid Khan S/O Samsudding B/C Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Sept 2019CRLAS/1186/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST Act, quashed the special court's order, and granted bail to the appellant subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 13.05.2019 quashed; appellant released on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Aabid Khan S/O Samsudding B/C Mev Vs State of Rajasthan — Contempt of Court | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1186/2019

¶3

Aabid Khan S/o Samsuddin B/c Mev, Aged About 27 Years, Occupation Labour R/o Dayana Bas Ps Sikri Dist. Bharatpur Raj. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶4

----Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, P.P.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶9

Order

¶10

20/09/2019

¶11

The present criminal appeal under Section 14(A) (2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection with FIR No.08/2019 registered at Police Station Ramgarh District Alwar for the offences under Section 376 of IPC and Section 3 (II) (5A)- 3(II) (5) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶12

Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the prosecutrix is a married lady, aged about 20 years and the FIR has been lodged after a delay of 18 days. Counsel further submits that the challan has already been presented in this matter and conclusion of the trial may take long time.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLAS-1186/2019]

¶16

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be just and expedient to order the release of the appellant on bail.

¶17

The order dated 13.05.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar is quashed and set-aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused appellant- Aabid Khan S/o Samsuddin shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶18

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶19

MG/01

Aabid Khan S/O Samsudding B/C Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aabid Khan S/O Samsudding B/C Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Omgiri S/O Shri Dolgiri, by Caste Goswami Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramcharan S/O Shri Nathuram B/C Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Kanaram S/O Hanuman B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Shakuntala Jain and Anr. Vs Mahendra Kumar

Ganesh Ingole S/O Keshav Rao B/C Maratha Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer@Shivprakash S/O Sitaram B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan