Mohammad Hussain v. Mst Sakeena Thr Lrs

Court Cases 221 Mohd. I?ehtab Kharqand others Versus Khushnuma ibrahi +$?T~~o$W

"In a situation where the learned trial court on a consideration of the respective cases of the parties and the documents laid before it was of the view that the

entitlement of the plaintiffs to an order of interim mandatory injunction was in serious doubt, the appellate court could not have interfered with the exercise of

+p z3 *+ %{herefore, should not have substituted its views in @sKatter merely on the ground that in its opinion the % s ' of the case call for a different conclusion. Such an !meter eter for exercise of )eal aaainst a conclusions ssible view the V of law in this of law in this nder Ltd. v. Antox

m 2 fa5 "rn