In a civil miscellaneous appeal, the High Court dismissed the appellant Insurance Company's appeal against a motor accident compensation warrant/-award of Rs.1,00,500/- after it was fairly admitted that the impugned award had already been executed.
The appeal was dismissed; the order dated 25.06.2007 was upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJA ST HA^
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 327312007
National Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Station Road, Jhunjhunu Through Regional Office, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur.
Versus
,r..- id-& 1 "I -. ?
:: xT .", - ti; ,?> &;
(C , +-- s-z il;:p p-$dq22h tt-4.j ,;, -%%:ik . --$--fi&$,I$irna --?. a I$t ... -"= ntslespondents
,&.-& $ , ?, ..: J ,.. ,,>& F*.$-. . . -. '2 72:;-" -;.%+. 2.25.~
.-.r-7 ,;* BTTL% .; s. '.&".'& ( %, %...P.liriJIS & &ki -a,, -4 4 ;? <P-??,I; -.a-s< .... $, t a' sa-;, ,2p; ii'.c' y
==-,ai"."." ^ :~~gqHF&~~$f
For Appeliant(s) r. f$.;=@@iha L;pl Jh a iLk f+J &-&%. .e ? en)8azn A,;.2 . * g . J
P. w L: ?&??:>7~,>-3~ ,: .a %\ ;>,-..-c 9
For Respondent@) in\ dm. .+v. v. -. ,' 2 ;IP+ 1 , .%,. <j3,i1 , rfi r. -.*: L: 16 P R,
> :.. -. ?. --?
,% Y; ,! , .<* IC $v'-..A.ifi.J*;w.r ., .* aa.>+'. :**f .-! 2;s. !r? ";,a- L,, ; - f' . .
.. -
$" fr
\k e. Q ":t ,i
J.d $> R1 ":
HON'BLE MR.JUSTE:,&KASH I- 1 I$ GUPTA
if 48 5 1 j! ,{i iL ,{f . +
: & ;ai +
e.9 Id.:ff&,ml,d $6
<,p;.;;$G ,,,.),.,.nu ' , . + ' , --z h .lt?
F'? !,C -1" 1. 3.. f ;p-y;. +#< '. - , -*L,, :: ;-, " $ #$ I,]
08/08/2019 T=+. $2 -2; T
;g 1 , -?; . 1 v -7 %:eii .:';"
i, <Z&$?JK . .; :. y
In st a n t a @$;7qi+iS+hCgg:BtIn +22s5 %,:-& w..m..h jk '.: .% .p 5fi.l e d by t h e I n s u ra n ce
d
Company against the u' ;$.u:dgip-&n -#$ T .%-, J. ! t ~2.j gdnai.;qaard dated 25.06.2007
.,...1:
passed by the Additiona,, District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track)
No.2 and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sikar, (hereinafter
referred to as 'the Tribunal'), whereby the Tribunal awarded a sum
of Rs.1,00,500/- as compensation along with interest @ 7% per
annum from the date of filing of the claim petition.
(2 of 2)
[CMA-3273/2007]
It is fairly admitted by the learned counsel 'for the appellant-Insurance Company that the impugned award has already been executed.
I ' have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company and perused the material available on record.
The claim-petition was filed by the claimant-respondent , h. T%J y=-.,i .jT k s ny Babul.a.1 seeking cornlgentsat-=:o.n onJ.a.co$nb $$i.nju ries sustained by -5, y, sad" ' - .-"a '1 $pc ,," h ti . . .. i- $. .-*.--, '> I $ him in a motw-..i,idhicle **_@_ --%* accident which occurred ti6R 17.03.2003. l;,. --.2<., $, ..: ,,,+ As per xl-?l'ermanent disability certificate caima"t-~$a~~ suffered x/,&.y _7%. ~&*y d'_ perman$8t disability to the extent of 24%. The ~rib&al has medical expenses, Rs.2,500/towards zation expenses & Rs.49,000/towards i ody due to permanent disability. In this I has awarded total compensation to the
e impugned j.udgment , .no ground is mad.e out to interfere in the iw-pugned jd,grne.t$,-and award. 4 j ,,A=,V p..e 'a;?;! \ iq $;;:d ., "i 4 '% .* I? s.:, Consequently, the appeal fails and is accordingly
dismissed.
Mohit Rohiia /3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil miscellaneous appeal can be allowed when the impugned award has been executed despite no substantial ground being made out.
National Insurance Company Ltd.
Babulal S/o Biharilal Saini
Justice Kanishk Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
