Dismissed

Manish Kumar S/O Vishnu Kumar Choudhary v. Nagar Palika Board through Chairman Nagar Palika Mukandgarh

Rajasthan HC6 Aug 2019CR/20/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted withdrawal of a civil revision petition, directing the trial court to frame preliminary issues under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and decide them under Order 1 Rule 2 CPC according to a prior order.

What did the court decide?

Permission for withdrawal granted; direction to frame and decide preliminary issues under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and Order 1 Rule 2 CPC.

Manish Kumar S/O Vishnu Kumar Choudhary Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RkJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 20/2019

¶3

1. Manish Kumar S/o Vishnu Kumar Choudhary, B/c Mahajan R/o Ward No. 11 Mukandgarh Tehsil Nawalgarh District Jhunjhunu

¶4

Saroj Devi Bhalia W/o Raj Kumar Now W/o Uma Shankar,
Aged About 51 Years, B/c Mahajan R/o House No. 331
Sector 6 Vidyadhar Nagar Jaipur Through Power Of
Attorney Harun A11\S'<Mup,g]j.banB/c Chopdar Aged 42
%a
Years R/o< vullandgarh Tehsi?,dNawalgarh District
i;, " 1 <,?.
~hunjhut%a(~aj) t.L +-- si I
' >
% y-+ ," .&.
3 ----Defendants:Petitioners
Q-J+ - >
*&.::' Y- Versus il I d, -,
i!. 5- r

¶5

Nagar Palika Board Through Chairman air Palika hunjhunu (Raj) aintiff/Respondent 2. sad, B/c Kumawat Nawalgarh District

¶6

¶7

gal Kishore Asliya, B/c In Front Of Axis Bank ct Jhunjhunu (Raj)

¶8

B/c Mali R/o Ward No. rict Jhunjhunu (Raj) ondents/Defendants : . -5 . ,," t . -.=&2:'t;aJ&~a&.jaL'?l: L.' For Petitioner(s) #A - .- sw -MI;. &oop-Dkand Pi v-. i P . . .sw> -2 +$ ' -L+ p, \ q For Respondent(s) :"t'~r. Amrt Jrndal for NP No.1 Mr. Mahendra Kumar Jain for NP No.2

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA

¶10

Order

¶11

06/08/2QB

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this revision petition. The only prayer made -by him is

¶13

that the learned trial court be directed to frame issue/issues regarding the objection raised by the petitioners in their application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and decide the same as preliminary issue/issues.

¶14

Permission, as sought for, is granted.

¶15

The revision petition is dismissed accordingly with a direction to the trial Court that if the trial Court is of the opinion #$,, %J p p ,F.$, that any issue/issue$$3p~a. on$ dhavei. been raised by the &\ " "'~7 h petitioners in f&iS application under Order 7 Rulr1.l I! CPC then it 4k.: ,p ,- 8 shall be free30 frame such issue/issues as per theipiigvisions of %::* t. i<* 4, f -+ Order 1 Rule 2 CPC and proceed to decide thk same in accordance with la ed by order dated . 01.11.2018.

¶16

(PRAKASH GUPTA),,

¶17

Mohit Rohila /I05

Manish Kumar S/O Vishnu Kumar Choudhary v. Nagar Palika Board through Chairman Nagar Palika Mukandgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar S/O Vishnu Kumar Choudhary v. Nagar Palika Board through Chairman Nagar Palika Mukandgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bajaj Allianz Gen Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sheela Devi and Ors.

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt. Manju Kanwar W/O Late Ranjeet Singh

Rekha Sharma D/O Shri Jai Prakash Bhinda W/O Shri Sandeep Kumar Shastri Vs Shri Sandeep Shastri S/O Shri Jagdish Prasad Shastri

Guddi and Others Vs Mukesh Kumar and Others

Pappu Qureshi and Others Vs Shahabuddin and Others

Raj Singh Chauhan Vs Balbir Singh and Others