The facts, in brief, giving rise to this appeal are that on the fateful day of 12th of October, 2011 while deceased Arjun was standing on the side of the road in front of N.M. Marble, Industrial Area, Banswara he was hit by Truck No.RJ-03/GA 0272. Due to crushing injuries suffered by the deceased, he died during treatment at Hospital. The incident was reported to the police station concerned and FIR was lodged. It is, inter-alia, averred in the claim petition that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the aforesaid truck by its driver. Besides impleading owner and driver of the vehicle, insurer was also impleaded as non-applicant. In order to claim compensation to the tune of Rs.83,20,000/- under different heads, it is inter-alia pleaded by the appellants that at the time of death, deceased was 55 years of age and earning Rs.40,000/- per month as RTO Tax Consultant and Advisor. In support thereof, documents were also produced including income tax returns for the assessment year 2012-13 showing annual taxable income of deceased to the tune of Rs.1,39,161/-. Learned Tribunal, while considering the material available on record, found that accident has occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the insured vehicle. While adverting to Issue No.3, which was settled on the basis of objections raised by the Insurer, the same was decided against the Insurer in want of evidence. The crucial issue relating to quantum of compensation is examined threadbare by learned Tribunal and relying on the
