The facts, in brief, are that appellant-plaintiffs laid a suit for for cancellation of Patta, declaring sale deed null & void and for permanent and mandatory injunction against respondentdefendants. Along with the plaint, appellants also preferred an application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC for temporary injunction. It is the case of the plaintiffs that land of Aaraji Nos.3347, 3348, 3349, 3350 admeasuring 1.4900 hectare i.e. 2/10 of the total land was purchased through registered saledeeds dated 21.02.2013 from one Panna Lal Bheel and thereafter applications were laid before the Urban Improvement Trust under the provisions of Section 90-A of the Land Revenue Act for conversion of the land from agriculture to non-agriculture purposes. It is also the case of plaintiffs that other purchasers of remaining parts of the land of aforesaid Arajis also submitted their applications for conversion of land on 24.06.2013. It is claimed that their applications for allotment of land in their favour were pending consideration respondent No.5 U.I.T., but as they were out of town, they could not appear before the U.I.T. and taking benefit of this situation defendants Nos.1 to 3 got issued allotment orders in their favour by submitting requisite fees through challan. It is claimed that by putting forged signatures of the appellants in the office of U.I.T., the allotments orders were got issued by defendant Nos.1 to 3 in their favour showing that the appellants had consented for it whereas the appellants had never given consent or authorized defendants Nos.1 to 3 to get allotment
