Gumanmal and Ors. v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sangnet Lodha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Mehta held that even after arguing at length, the learned counsel for the petitioners did not want to press the contempt petition at this stage. Consequently, the contempt proceedings were dropped at this stage.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings dropped at this stage. Notices discharged. Petitioners permitted to file fresh petition if occasion arises.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Contempt No. 545/2018
- Gumanmal S/o Shri Jetharam, R/o 597, Near Bus Stand, Badgoan, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore.
- Soma Ram S/o Shri Rupa Ji, R/o 480, Khakhariya Damsin, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore.
- Daya Ram S/o Shri Narna Ram, R/o 133, Dahipur, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore.
- Jagata Ram S/o Shri Achla Ram, R/o 776, Pithpura, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore.
- Bhamra Ram S/o Shri Chatra Ram, R/o 73, Dodwariya Sewadiya, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore.
- Shankar Lal S/o Shri Khima Ram, R/o 581, Bus Stand Pass, Badgav Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore.
- Taga Ram S/o Shri Daya Ram, S/o 20, Mukhya Abadli, Adapura, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore.
----Petitioners
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition against the respondents should be pressed given the counsel's wish not to press it at this stage.
Whether the issued notices should be discharged.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gumanmal S/o Shri Jetharam
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Revenue Department
Coram
Sangnet Lodha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WCP/545/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court