The High Court of Rajasthan granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal due to a lower tax effect and a coordinate bench order, subsequently dismissing the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Central/Excise Appeal No. 114/2017
Union of India through the Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax Commissionerate, Jodhpur, 117/5, P.W.D. Colony, Jodhpur. (Rajasthan).
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Falgun Buch
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
20/09/2018
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the controversy involved in the present appeal stands covered by order dated 6.3.18 passed by a Coordinate Bench in a batch of appeals led by D.B.Central/excise Appeal No.68/2017 (Union of India Vs. M/s Sharda Gum & Chemicals (Unit-II). However, in view of the Circular No. F.No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 11.7.18 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, the tax effect involved in the present appeal being less than 50,00,000/(Fifty lacs), learned counsel appearing for the appellant, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
The permission is granted.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
rp17
Union of India through the Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax Commissionerate, Jodhpur
M/s Sun Art Exporters (100% EOU)
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi
SANGEET LODHA
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
