The High Court disposed of this writ petition filed for contempt. The petition was not proceeded with due to unconditional apology tendered by the respondents-contemnors in their reply.
Notices of contempt discharged and petition disposed of for statistical purposes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 334/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Vishnoi on behalf of Mr. Kailash Jangid. For Respondent(s) : -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
06/12/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that requisite compliance of the order dated 8.12.2017 passed by this Court has been made.
(2 of 2)
[WCP-334/2018]
The respondents have filed a reply evincing the compliance of the order dated 8.12.2017 by way of placing an order dated 8.5.2018.
In view of the aforesaid and in light of unconditional apology tendered by the respondents-contemnors in the reply, this Court is not inclined to proceed with the contempt petition.
Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
20-A.Arora/-
Basant Sharma
Deepak Kumar
Shri Bhaskar A. Sawant
Dr. Radheshyam Garg
Shri D. B. Gupta
Smt. Manjula Verma
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
