This is a thin contempt order where the petitioner did not dispute the respondents' submission that they had complied with earlier court directions; accordingly, notices were discharged and the petition was dismissed.
All notices issued are discharged and the contempt petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 10/2018
Ghanshyam Singh S/o Shri Ganpat Lal, By Caste- Rawna Rajput, R/o. Gaddi Kuwas Bas, Tausar, District Nagaur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.S. Bissa. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.K. Mehta, AGC.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
23/10/2018
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that reply to the contempt petition has been filed and that the respondents have complied with the directions issued by this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the above submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents.
In view of the submissions made, the notices issued are discharged. The contempt petition is dismissed.
(ARUN BHANSALI)J.
PKS-186
Ghanshyam Singh S/o Shri Ganpat Lal
State Of Rajasthan
Shri Ashok Kumar Garg
Shri A.r. Choudhary
ARUN BHANSALI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
