Allowed

Shanti Lal Choudhary v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan HC22 Oct 2018CW/9585/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the writ petition by following the judgment in Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors, directing the respondent Corporation to reimburse retired employees' dues with interest within six months.

What did the court decide?

The respondent Corporation was directed to reimburse retired employees' dues with interest within six months.

Shanti Lal Choudhary Vs Rajasthan State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 9585/2018

¶3

Shanti Lal Choudhary S/o Shri Pyar Chand, Aged About 61 Years, By Caste Kalal, Village Kewalpura, Tehsil Badi Sadri, District Chittorgarh

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur, Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director

¶7

The Chief Manager, Bhilwara Depot, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Bhilwara

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.C. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Purohit

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

¶11

Order

¶12

22/10/2018

¶13

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Sunil Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CW-9585/2018]

¶17

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra)

¶18

directed as under :-

¶19

“In this background, these writ petitions deserve to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶20

No order as to costs.”

¶21

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same

¶22

directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶23

(ARUN BHANSALI)J.

¶24

A.K. Chouhan/-58

Shanti Lal Choudhary v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanti Lal Choudhary v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upendra Sen Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Seema Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Dr. Alpana Kulhari Vs Raj.Public Service Commission and Anr.

Shri Gandhi Bal Niketan, Ratangarh Vs Naresh Pal Gangwar and Ors.

Usha Purohit Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Poonam Talreja Nasa Vs State of Rajasthan