Allowed

Hasti Mal Surana v. Rsrtc Jaipur and Anr.

Rajasthan HC23 Oct 2018CW/6041/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Bench disposed of a writ petition by relying on a prior judgment Daulat Ram, directing the respondent Corporation to reimburse retired employee dues. The order was made without fresh adjudication based on the earlier decision.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner is allowed; Respondent Corporation directed to reimburse entire dues of retired employees with interest within six months.

Hasti Mal Surana Vs Rsrtc Jaipur and Anr. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 6041/2018

¶3

Hasti Mal Surana Son Of Shri Mohan Lalji, By Caste Surana, Resident Of Higher Secondary School Road, Vivekanand Mohalla, Gangrar, District Chittorgarh.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur, Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director.

¶7

The Chief Manager, Chittorgarh Depot, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chittorgarh.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.C. Sharma. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

23/10/2018

Issue notice.

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Sunil Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondentCorporation.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CW-6041/2018]

¶18

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra)

¶19

directed as under :-

¶20

“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶21

No order as to costs.”

¶22

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶23

(ARUN BHANSALI),J.

¶24

Sumit-17

Hasti Mal Surana v. Rsrtc Jaipur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hasti Mal Surana v. Rsrtc Jaipur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Gandhi Bal Niketan, Ratangarh Vs Naresh Pal Gangwar and Ors.

Usha Purohit Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Shanti Lal Choudhary Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Kamlesh Kumar Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ghanshyam Singh Vs State and Ors.

Madan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.