This order suspends the petitioner's trial sentence during the pendency of appeal and admits him to bail subject to the Trial Court's satisfaction, noting he was already on bail.
Sentence suspended during pendency of appeal; petitioner admitted to bail subject to Trial Court satisfaction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. (SOS) Appl. No. 13 / 2018
In
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 47 / 2018
Rajeev Modi, S/o Shri S.M. Modi, Former Managing Director M/s Parakaram Technofeb Ltd., R/o E-156, Kalkaji, New Delhi. (presently petitioner is confined in Central Jail, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Hora
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Order
22/01/2018
Heard.
Petitioner was on bail, during trial.
Accordingly, sentence of the petitioner shall remain suspended during the pendency of the appeal. Petitioner be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the Trial Court.
(SABINA)J.
Sudha/73
Rajeev Modi
Union Of India
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
