The High Court granted bail to Smt. Maya Devi in S.B. Cri. Bail App. 93/2018, considering her gender and the facts, while noting an interim order was in place until 16-04-2018.
Bail granted to the petitioner with interim order maintained until April 16, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-93/2018 Smt. Maya Devi Vs. State of Raj.
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-93/2018 IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 163/2018
Smt. Maya Devi W/o Prakash Harijan B/c Harijan, R/o Kunda Kacchi Basti, Jhalana Mahal, Infront Of J.k. Plot, Ps Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).
--Accused/Appellant
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
vihykfFkZ;k ds vf/koDrk Jh jkfgy dykeA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh jkejru xqtZjA
%% vkns'k %% 15-03-2018
U;k;ky; }kjk %&
vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa
2
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-93/2018 Smt. Maya Devi Vs. State of Raj.
i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us bl U;k;ky; ds iwoZ vkns'k dh ikyuk esa tokc is'k ugha fd;k gSA
;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykfFkZ;k dk dFku jgk fd vihykfFkZ;k efgyk gS rFkk ml ij fdlh izdkj ls vyx ls vkgr ds pksV ekjus dk vkjksi ugha gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ,oa vkgr ds c;kuksa esa vfHk;qDr jktsUnz ij loZizFke iRFkj ekjus dk vkjksi yxk;k x;k gS rFkk vkgr ds 'kjhj ij dqy nks pksVsa vkuk crk;k x;k gSA muds vuqlkj nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; dzksldsl Hkh ntZ gq, gSaA vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk
fojks/k fd;kA
leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA vkgr ds 'kjhj ij dkfjr pksV dh izd`fr ,oa ih-M-3 ds c;kuksa ds dze esa tks rdZ o rF; izLrqr fd;s x;s gSa] mudks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vihykfFkZ;k Jherh ek;knsoh bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 16-04-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj
3
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-93/2018 Smt. Maya Devi Vs. State of Raj.
:i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] la[;k&5] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k &02@2016 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 20-01 - 2018 ds rgr fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@& mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail based on her as a female and the facts of the case.
Whether the bail application filed under Section 438 CrPC should be allowed.
Whether the interim order granted for a specific date needs to be maintained or reconsidered.
Smt. Maya Devi
State of Rajasthan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
