High Court granted bail to an elderly accused under 66 years of age, suffering severe ailments, pending his criminal appeal, noting the absence of serious injury risk. The disposal includes a proviso for consequential bail in other pending proceedings.
Bail granted to the accused-appellant; consequential bail directed for related proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-256/2018 Amar Chand Gupta Vs. State of Raj.
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-256/2018 IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 402/2018
Amar Chand Gupta S/o Parsadi Lal Gupta, B/c Vaishy, R/o Village Donpur, Police Station, Laxmangarh, District Alwar, Presently R/o House No. 24, Daudpur Alwar, Police Station, Shivji Park Alwar, The Then Junior Engineer, Jaipur Vidyyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jaipur Sub Division Jurahara, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Sevar Bharatpur)
--Accused-Appellant
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh fnus'k dqekj xxZA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,u-,l- 'ks[kkorA
2
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-256/2018 Amar Chand Gupta Vs. State of Raj.
%% vkns'k %% 13-03-2018
U;k;ky; }kjk %&
izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk dFku jgk fd vihykFkhZ fu.kZ; dh rkjh[k ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA og 66 o"kZ dk O;fDr gS rFkk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k tks cpko vihykFkhZ us izLrqr fd;k gS] mlds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ dk iw.kZ :i ls nks"keqfDr dk ekeyk curk gSA vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk
fojks/k fd;kA
leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA ewy :i ls vihykFkhZ dh vk;q dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ
3
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-256/2018 Amar Chand Gupta Vs. State of Raj.
vejpan xqIrk bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 13-04-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] Hkz"Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e] Hkjriqj }kjk QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k &159@2014¼59@2004½ esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 20-02 - 2018 ds rgr fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@& mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the accused-appellant during his pending criminal appeal.
Amar Chand Gupta
State of Rajasthan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
