Allowed

Suresh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC11 May 2018SOSA/434/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Supreme Court considers application for anticipatory bail in a case where petitioner's husband committed suicide after her arrest. Court grants bail subject to conditions including separate trials and appearance within specified timeframes.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail subject to appearance within 20 days of the impugned order and subsequent extraordinary bail if arrested again.

Suresh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj

¶3

%% vk ns 'k %%

¶4

,dy ihB QkStnkjh fofo/k ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk&i= la[;k % 434@2018 vUrxZr ,dy ihB QkStnkjh vihy la[;k 671@2018

¶5

Suresh S/o Panna Ram B/c Bawaria, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Badau, PS Khetrinagar, District Jhunjhunu. (Accused in Sub Jail, Khetri).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan Through PP.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

¶11

vkns'k fnukad % 11-5-2018

¶12

%% mifLFkr %%

¶13

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶14

izkFkhZ@vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh ts vkj VkfV;k@, ,u [kku@ Jh vkj vkj lksuh@ Jh ih ds dkSf'kdA

¶15

yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,u ,l 'ks[kkorA

¶16

¶17

U;k;ky; }kjk %

¶18

;ksX; vfHkHkk"kd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr@vihykFkhZ ,oa ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dks bl ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk&i= ij lquk x;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA

¶19

¶20

vihy fopkjkFkZ xzg.k dh tk pqdh gSA

¶21

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ek= vfHk;ksD=h ds ifr ds dgus ds vk/kkj ij eqdnek ntZ djok;k x;k gSA mudk dFku jgk gS fd vfHk;ksD=h ds ifr thou dk fookg iwoZ esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh cfgu deyk ds lkFk gqvk Fkk] ftldh ngst ds ekeys esa gR;k gksus ds dkj.k mDr thou ds fo:) vkijkf/kd izdj.k fopkjk/khu jgkA rRi'pkr~ mDr thou }kjk vfHk;ksD=h ds lkFk fookg fd;k x;k rFkk mDr thou ds fo:) vfHk;ksD=h dks ekjus ds dze esa Hkh izdj.k fopkjk/khu py jgk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd lEiw.kZ i=koyh ij vfHk;ksD=h ds lkFk vfHkdfFkr d`R; fd, tkus dk rF; izekf.kr ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dkQh le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSaA vr% izkFkhZ@vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkosaA

¶22

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk mDr rdksZ dk fojks/k fd;k x;k rFkk gLrxr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶23

lquk x;k ,oa fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶24

ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks e/;utj j[krs gq, rFkk izkFkhZ@;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy esa mBk, x, dkuwuh eqn~nksa ds vk/kkj ij vihy fopkjkFkZ xzg.k fd, tkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i vihy dh fu;fer lquokbZ ds Øe esa lwphc) gksus ds vUrjky dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, rFkk izkFkhZ vfHk;qDr dk iwoZ esa tekur vkosnu Lohdkj gksus rFkk ftu vk/kkjksa ij tekur dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k x;k] mudks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds vU; rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds dze esa xq.kkoxq.k ij

¶25

¶26

fVIi.kh fd, fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶27

vr% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lqjs'k bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 11-6-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq] ipkl gtkj :i, dk cU/k&i= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i, dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr djs rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos ,oa fo}ku vij lS'ku U;k;kk/kh'k] [ksrMh] jktLFkku }kjk izdj.k la[;k 31@2014 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 20 ekpZ] 2018 ds rgr fn, x, ^^n.Mkns'k** dk fØ;kUo;u bl vihy ds fu.khZr gksus rd LFkfxr j[kk tkosA

¶28

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶29

ts ,l iaokj@48

¶30

mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k 1] fn- 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lEcfU/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k x;kA

Suresh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajmal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Lachharam Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Ramswaroop and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Harkesh Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Mahaveer and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Nageshwar Soni Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp.