The court allowed an application under Section 389 CrPC for suspension of sentences pending appeal. It noted the High Court had already granted relief in a previous order and adjourned hearing before issuing the order.
Section 389 CrPC prayer allowed; relief reserved; High Court’s prior order noted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-502/2018 Lachharam Vs. State of Raj.
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-502/2018 IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1623/2017
Lachharam S/o Kishnaram B/c Jat, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Sajjanpura, Ps Danta Ramgarh, District Sikar, Raj. (At Present in District Jail, Sikar)
--Accused/Appellant
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh okbZ lh 'kekZ ,oa Jh fo'ks"k 'kekZA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,u-,l- 'ks[kkorA
%% vkns'k %% 10-05-2018
U;k;ky; }kjk %&
izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa
2
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-502/2018 Lachharam Vs. State of Raj.
i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk dFku jgk fd orZeku ekeys esa ?kVuk ek= lk/kkj.k ekjihV dh gS ,oa vf/kd ls vf/kd ekeyk /kkjk 341]323 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk ekuk tk ldrk gSA mudk rdZ jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us ek= ekjihV dh ?kVuk ds dze esa erd dh eR;q ds vk/kkj ij /kkjk 306 H kkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa nks"kfl) fd;k gSA vihykFkhZ fiNys ,d o"kZ ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk
fojks/k fd;kA
leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] cgl ds nkSjku ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ yPNkjke bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 08-06-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa
3
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-502/2018 Lachharam Vs. State of Raj.
fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&4] lhdj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k &140@2015 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 18-08-2017 ds rgr fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@& mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail agrément application is to be allowed considering the relief granted by the High Court in Section 389 CrPC proceedings.
Whether a prior relief under FIR-140/2015 by the High Court affects the bail application.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Lachharam
State of Rajasthan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
