The Supreme Court held that bail conceding substantial rights in the habeas corpus nature of the petition satisfies the requirements of Section 495 CrPC and no separate order speaking in terms of Section 495 CrPC is required.
Dir to produce petitioners. Dir to pay costs to Respondent. Dir to govt to recover all costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
%% vk ns 'k %%
,dy ihB QkStnkjh fofo/k ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk&i= la[;k 418 @2018 vUrxZr ,dy ihB QkStnkjh vihy la[;k % 651@2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondent
vkns'k fnukad % 11-5-2018
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
[email protected] ds vf/koDrk Jh c`teksgu 'kekZ
2
yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,u ,l 'ks[kkor izR;FkhZ i{k ds vf/koDrk Jh feFkqu prqosZnhA
U;k;ky; }kjk %
;ksX; vfHkHkk"kd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;[email protected] ,oa ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dks bl ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk&i= ij lquk x;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA
vkt nkSjkus cgl ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fuosnu fd;k x;k fd os vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZ egkohj dh gn rd bl ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= ij cy ugha nsrs gSaA
muds }kjk 'ks"k izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds dze esa fuosnu fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk vkgr i{k ds 'kjhj ij tks pksVsa ekjus dk vkjksi gSa] os pksVsa ;k rks lk/kkj.k izdfr dh gS vFkok ,slh izdfr dh gSa tks xaHkhj rks gSa fdUrq 'kjhj ds fdlh ekfeZd Hkkx ij dkfjr gksdj thou ds fy, izk.k?kkrd ugha gSaA vr% 'ks"k izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkosaA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk mDr rdksZ dk fojks/k fd;k x;k rFkk gLrxr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
lquk x;k ,oa fopkj fd;k x;kA
ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks e/;utj j[krs gq, rFkk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;[email protected] dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy fopkjkFkZ xzg.k fd, tkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i vihy dh fu;fer lquokbZ ds Øe esa lwphc) gksus ds vUrjky dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, rFkk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr egkohj ds vykok vU;
3
vfHk;qDrx.k ds U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gksus ds en~nsutj izdj.k ds vU; rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh fd, fcuk] ;g vykok izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr egkohj ds vykok vU; izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds dze esa ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
vr% fuosnu vuqlkj vfHk;qDr izkFkhZ& egkohj dh gn rd ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= cy ugha fn, tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gS rFkk 'ks"k vfHk;[email protected] ds dze esa ;g ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k@ vihykFkhZx.k equs'k] uUnyky] ekf.kd rFkk lksuw bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 11-6-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mUgsa vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh&viuh mifLFkfr gsrq] ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i, ds cU/k&i= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i, dh nks&nks izfrHkwfr;ka fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr djs rks mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos ,oa fo}ku vij lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k] la[;k 4] Hkjriqj }kjk lS'ku izdj.k la[;k 1@2018 ¼lh vkbZ ,l ua 1026@2015½ esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 27-3-2018 ds rgr fn, x, ^^n.Mkns'k** dk fØ;kUo;u bl vihy ds fu.khZr gksus rd LFkfxr j[kk tkosA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
ts,liaokj@47
mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k 1] fn- 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lEcfU/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k x;kA
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail conceding substantial rights in habeas corpus satisfies the requirements of Section 495 CrPC.
Whether observation must be framed in terms of Section 495 CrPC for a habeas corpus proceedings.
Whether Section 144 CrPC can be invoked as a direction in habeas corpus proceedings instead of granting bail.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahaveer S/o Bhagwat B/c Jaatav
Munesh S/o Bhagwat B/c Jaatav
Nand Lal S/o Bhagwat B/c Jaatav
Manik S/o Bhagwat B/c Jaatav
Sonu S/o Mikki B/c Jaatav
J. B.S Chauhan
J. M. R. Shiekh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
